Friday, August 16, 2002
I finally figured out where I heard this sort of justification before....
posted by lazarus |
The failure to take on Saddam after what the president said would produce such a collapse in confidence in the president that it would set back the war on terrorism.
Sounds almost exactly like the justification the Supreme Court used to appoint the Boy King, doesn't it? They essentially stopped the recount because finding out that Gore won would harm Bush's claim to the Presidency.
Has any person ever been given so much for so little reason, and deserved it less?